正在載入地圖…
英國
倫敦
城市選擇
選擇一個城市
數字是全球統一尺度的研究估算；R 代表研究中。所有內容均非旅遊建議。
看看這裡怎麼樣
找到心儀的飯店了？訂房前，先看看周邊區域。
搜尋服務政策
點選搜尋會把查詢內容與所選城市傳送給 OpenStreetMap Nominatim，請勿輸入私人住址或敏感資訊。 搜尋服務政策
正在連接本機目錄…
非常安全
較安全
謹慎
高風險
很高風險
極端風險
倫敦: 79
數字是全球統一尺度的研究估算；R 代表研究中。所有內容均非旅遊建議。
找到心儀的飯店了？訂房前，先看看周邊區域。
點選搜尋會把查詢內容與所選城市傳送給 OpenStreetMap Nominatim，請勿輸入私人住址或敏感資訊。 搜尋服務政策
出發前，先瞭解
全球統一尺度的研究估算：以倫敦官方犯罪和大眾運輸資料為錨點，缺少城市覆蓋的維度使用英國國家級回退。
城市研究估算為 79/100；模型尺度上分數越高越安全。 證據日期: · 信賴度: B
顏色反映城市內部的區域證據。 空白處缺少區域證據，不代表安全。
33 個已映射區域 ·
邊界資料: Greater London Authority · London Borough Boundaries (Greater London Authority open data terms)
城市估算不能評估某條街道、某家飯店或特定時段。
A global-scale research estimate anchored by official London crime and transport evidence, with United Kingdom-level fallbacks and explicit uncertainty for dimensions without city-level coverage.
Research-only estimates. Scores combine city-local evidence with documented national or regional fallback inputs; confidence communicates uncertainty. They are not travel advice.
Research estimate centered on London's global city score. Borough variation uses the latest single-month anonymized street-level records from the official UK Police API, weighted toward violence, robbery and traveler-relevant theft, then normalized by the latest Nomis resident population. Commuters, visitors, reporting practices, anonymized locations and a one-month window can materially distort central borough rates; City of London receives lower confidence. Overall only; not travel advice.
alerts are not long-term baseline risk; event footprint may not equal traveler exposure; alert severity cannot be copied directly into Safrom score
country-level only; humanitarian risk framing differs from traveler exposure; composite inputs can overlap Safrom dimensions; current event conditions require separate signals
country-level only; reporting and justice-system differences; latest year differs by country; not traveler-specific
police-recorded offences exclude unreported crime; fraud is primarily handled outside individual police-force data; resident commuter and traveler exposure are mixed; raw counts require a reviewed denominator; data uploaded after February 2024 comes from CONNECT and is not directly comparable with earlier files; City of London is policed separately
country-level only; availability does not measure emergency accessibility; latest year differs by country; distribution within a country is hidden
country-level only; collection is not annual for every country; some values are modeled estimates; resident exposure differs from traveler exposure
police-recorded crime excludes unreported crime; offence volumes mix residents commuters and visitors; acquisitive-crime share is not a traveler victimization rate; City of London Police coverage differs from Metropolitan Police Service coverage
network-level rate does not represent walking cycling taxis or private vehicles; reported incidents may understate victimization; passenger journeys are a transport exposure denominator rather than a resident or traveler population denominator
does not isolate London; U.S.-traveler perspective; Level 2 is driven by terrorism and is not an absolute safety score; narrative guidance requires structured extraction review
country-level only; modeled perceptions rather than traveler incidents; cannot represent neighborhood variation or current events; confidence intervals must not be discarded
boundary validity does not validate or score crime evidence; the official service also publishes other ward vintages so layer 9 and boundary version 2022 must remain pinned; the live boundary and MPS ward code sets have not yet been checksum-reconciled in the current network environment; City of London is excluded from the 32-borough election geography