スコアは世界共通の尺度による研究推計です。R は作業中を示します。旅行の助言ではありません。
ホテルが見つかりましたか？予約前に周辺エリアを確認しましょう。
検索すると入力内容と選択都市を OpenStreetMap Nominatim に送信します。個人の住所や機密情報は入力しないでください。 検索サービスの方針
旅立つ前に、知っておこう
出典を伴う研究推計です。地域資料は不完全で、必要に応じて広域の代替値を使用します。
都市全体の研究推計：79/100。モデルの尺度では高いほど安全です。 根拠日付: · 資料の確かさ: B
色は都市内の資料を反映します。 空白の場所は地域資料がなく、安全を意味しません。
33地域を掲載 ·
境界: Greater London Authority · London Borough Boundaries (Greater London Authority open data terms)
都市スコアは個々の街路、ホテル、時間帯を表しません。レイヤーの出典、日付、制約を確認してください。
A global-scale research estimate anchored by official London crime and transport evidence, with United Kingdom-level fallbacks and explicit uncertainty for dimensions without city-level coverage.
Research-only estimates. Scores combine city-local evidence with documented national or regional fallback inputs; confidence communicates uncertainty. They are not travel advice.
Research estimate centered on London's global city score. Borough variation uses the latest single-month anonymized street-level records from the official UK Police API, weighted toward violence, robbery and traveler-relevant theft, then normalized by the latest Nomis resident population. Commuters, visitors, reporting practices, anonymized locations and a one-month window can materially distort central borough rates; City of London receives lower confidence. Overall only; not travel advice.
alerts are not long-term baseline risk; event footprint may not equal traveler exposure; alert severity cannot be copied directly into Safrom score
country-level only; humanitarian risk framing differs from traveler exposure; composite inputs can overlap Safrom dimensions; current event conditions require separate signals
country-level only; reporting and justice-system differences; latest year differs by country; not traveler-specific
police-recorded offences exclude unreported crime; fraud is primarily handled outside individual police-force data; resident commuter and traveler exposure are mixed; raw counts require a reviewed denominator; data uploaded after February 2024 comes from CONNECT and is not directly comparable with earlier files; City of London is policed separately
country-level only; availability does not measure emergency accessibility; latest year differs by country; distribution within a country is hidden
country-level only; collection is not annual for every country; some values are modeled estimates; resident exposure differs from traveler exposure
police-recorded crime excludes unreported crime; offence volumes mix residents commuters and visitors; acquisitive-crime share is not a traveler victimization rate; City of London Police coverage differs from Metropolitan Police Service coverage
network-level rate does not represent walking cycling taxis or private vehicles; reported incidents may understate victimization; passenger journeys are a transport exposure denominator rather than a resident or traveler population denominator
does not isolate London; U.S.-traveler perspective; Level 2 is driven by terrorism and is not an absolute safety score; narrative guidance requires structured extraction review
country-level only; modeled perceptions rather than traveler incidents; cannot represent neighborhood variation or current events; confidence intervals must not be discarded
boundary validity does not validate or score crime evidence; the official service also publishes other ward vintages so layer 9 and boundary version 2022 must remain pinned; the live boundary and MPS ward code sets have not yet been checksum-reconciled in the current network environment; City of London is excluded from the 32-borough election geography