삿포로
도시 선택
점수는 세계 공통 척도의 연구 추정치입니다. R은 작업 중을 뜻하며 여행 조언이 아닙니다.
장소 확인
마음에 드는 호텔을 찾으셨나요? 예약 전에 주변 지역을 확인하세요.
검색 서비스 정책
검색 시 입력 내용과 선택 도시를 OpenStreetMap Nominatim에 전송합니다. 사적인 주소나 민감 정보를 입력하지 마세요. 검색 서비스 정책
점수는 세계 공통 척도의 연구 추정치입니다. R은 작업 중을 뜻하며 여행 조언이 아닙니다.
마음에 드는 호텔을 찾으셨나요? 예약 전에 주변 지역을 확인하세요.
검색 시 입력 내용과 선택 도시를 OpenStreetMap Nominatim에 전송합니다. 사적인 주소나 민감 정보를 입력하지 마세요. 검색 서비스 정책
떠나기 전에 알아보세요
출처가 있는 연구 추정치입니다. 지역 자료가 불완전하며 필요시 광역 대체값을 사용합니다.
도시 전체 연구 추정치: 88/100. 모델 척도에서 높을수록 더 안전합니다. 근거 날짜: · 자료 신뢰도: C
연구 추정치: 현지 근거가 있는 한 항목만 달라지고 다른 항목은 도시·국가 기준값을 유지합니다. 무색 지역은 지역 근거가 없으며 안전하다는 뜻이 아닙니다.
10개 지역 표시 ·
경계: Japan MLIT · Sapporo administrative wards, 2025 (CC BY 4.0)
도시 점수는 개별 거리·호텔·시간대를 설명하지 않습니다. 레이어의 출처·날짜·한계를 확인하세요.
Compare Sapporo's 10 wards using official theft records, resident populations and a source-linked safety research estimate.
Local property variation uses seven recorded theft categories, not all theft or scams. Bicycle and vehicle theft dominate the ward aggregate. Per-resident rates include crimes involving visitors and commuters; central commercial wards need this context. City property input compares like-for-like category rates to the existing Tokyo research anchor. Five non-crime inputs retain the existing Japan calibration; homicide uses the 2023 country observation. Only the property component varies between wards. Day/night profiles are unavailable.
Local property variation uses seven recorded theft categories, not all theft or scams. Bicycle and vehicle theft dominate the ward aggregate. Per-resident rates include crimes involving visitors and commuters; central commercial wards need this context. City property input compares like-for-like category rates to the existing Tokyo research anchor. Five non-crime inputs retain the existing Japan calibration; homicide uses the 2023 country observation. Only the property component varies between wards. Day/night profiles are unavailable.
Local property variation uses seven recorded theft categories, not all theft or scams. Bicycle and vehicle theft dominate the ward aggregate.
Per-resident rates include crimes involving visitors and commuters; central commercial wards need this context.
City property input compares like-for-like category rates to the existing Tokyo research anchor. Five non-crime inputs retain the existing Japan calibration; homicide uses the 2023 country observation.
Only the property component varies between wards. Day/night profiles are unavailable.
alerts are not long-term baseline risk; event footprint may not equal traveler exposure; alert severity cannot be copied directly into Safrom score
country-level only; humanitarian risk framing differs from traveler exposure; composite inputs can overlap Safrom dimensions; current event conditions require separate signals
0.2 per 100,000; a country prior for personal violence, not a city rate.; Uses the existing research homicide curve (0→0, 1→10).
country-level only; availability does not measure emergency accessibility; latest year differs by country; distribution within a country is hidden
country-level only; collection is not annual for every country; some values are modeled estimates; resident exposure differs from traveler exposure
Seven published theft types; excludes shoplifting, most pickpocketing, fraud and violence.; Resident population does not include visitors and commuters; centre-city rates reflect this difference.; No individual incident addresses or times are included in this aggregate.; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/; Ward aggregation and research transformation by Safrom.
resident_register_including_foreign_residents; Residents include foreign residents; visitors and commuters are not a denominator.
犯罪発生情報(年計)、東京都・警視庁、CC BY 4.0; aggregated by Safrom; https://portal.data.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/terms/; Calibration reference only; nine records with no municipality are excluded.; Reference population: 9,953,160, 2025 preliminary census. https://www.my.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/w/003-20260529-257352507
U.S.-traveler perspective; Level 1 is a broad country advisory and cannot represent Tokyo neighborhood variation; advisory level is not an absolute safety score
country-level only; modeled perceptions rather than traveler incidents; cannot represent neighborhood variation or current events; confidence intervals must not be discarded