툴루즈
도시 선택
점수는 세계 공통 척도의 연구 추정치입니다. R은 작업 중을 뜻하며 여행 조언이 아닙니다.
장소 확인
마음에 드는 호텔을 찾으셨나요? 예약 전에 주변 지역을 확인하세요.
검색 서비스 정책
검색 시 입력 내용과 선택 도시를 OpenStreetMap Nominatim에 전송합니다. 사적인 주소나 민감 정보를 입력하지 마세요. 검색 서비스 정책
점수는 세계 공통 척도의 연구 추정치입니다. R은 작업 중을 뜻하며 여행 조언이 아닙니다.
마음에 드는 호텔을 찾으셨나요? 예약 전에 주변 지역을 확인하세요.
검색 시 입력 내용과 선택 도시를 OpenStreetMap Nominatim에 전송합니다. 사적인 주소나 민감 정보를 입력하지 마세요. 검색 서비스 정책
떠나기 전에 알아보세요
출처가 있는 연구 추정치입니다. 지역 자료가 불완전하며 필요시 광역 대체값을 사용합니다.
도시 전체 연구 추정치: 81/100. 모델 척도에서 높을수록 더 안전합니다. 근거 날짜: · 자료 신뢰도: C
연구 추정치: 현지 근거가 있는 한 항목만 달라지고 다른 항목은 도시·국가 기준값을 유지합니다. 무색 지역은 지역 근거가 없으며 안전하다는 뜻이 아닙니다.
20개 지역 표시 ·
경계: Mairie de Toulouse / Toulouse Métropole · 20 quartiers de démocratie locale (Licence Ouverte 2.0)
도시 점수는 개별 거리·호텔·시간대를 설명하지 않습니다. 레이어의 출처·날짜·한계를 확인하세요.
Source-linked overall safety research estimate with an area safety layer; lower confidence reflects geographic fallbacks and incomplete local dimensions.
City violence and property inputs use ten separate SSMSI source indicators, bounded relative to the existing Paris research anchor. Only injury-crash pressure varies within this area map. Other dimensions inherit the city estimate. Resident population is not visitor exposure; road counts have no traffic-flow denominator. No street, hotel or night safety is established.
City violence and property inputs use ten separate SSMSI source indicators, bounded relative to the existing Paris research anchor. Only injury-crash pressure varies within this area map. Other dimensions inherit the city estimate. Resident population is not visitor exposure; road counts have no traffic-flow denominator. No street, hotel or night safety is established.
City violence and property inputs use ten separate SSMSI source indicators, bounded relative to the existing Paris research anchor.
Only injury-crash pressure varies within this area map. Other dimensions inherit the city estimate.
Resident population is not visitor exposure; road counts have no traffic-flow denominator. No street, hotel or night safety is established.
alerts are not long-term baseline risk; event footprint may not equal traveler exposure; alert severity cannot be copied directly into Safrom score
country-level only; humanitarian risk framing differs from traveler exposure; composite inputs can overlap Safrom dimensions; current event conditions require separate signals
country-level only; availability does not measure emergency accessibility; latest year differs by country; distribution within a country is hidden
country-level only; collection is not annual for every country; some values are modeled estimates; resident exposure differs from traveler exposure
Ten source indicators use separate like-for-like rate ratios against Paris; counts with different units are never added.; Resident-normalised records are not traveller victimisation probabilities; unreported crime and different visitor volumes remain limitations.; Local curve is a bounded research hypothesis, not an officially published safety score.
does not isolate Paris; U.S.-traveler perspective; advisory level is not an absolute safety score; narrative guidance requires structured extraction review
country-level only; modeled perceptions rather than traveler incidents; cannot represent neighborhood variation or current events; confidence intervals must not be discarded
BAAC counts police-recorded road crashes with at least one person requiring care; property-damage-only crashes are outside this dataset.; One characteristics row per unique accident ID; not a victim, vehicle or all-incident count. Records missing coordinates, outside the boundaries or on an ambiguous boundary are excluded, never moved to the nearest area.; Absolute counts are affected by roads, traffic and pedestrian/cyclist exposure. These are mobility evidence, not crime rates or a safety ranking.; 2024 facts are shown using the current 20-quartier boundary file; the source catalogue historical description of six sectors is not used as the feature count.