점수는 세계 공통 척도의 연구 추정치입니다. R은 작업 중을 뜻하며 여행 조언이 아닙니다.
마음에 드는 호텔을 찾으셨나요? 예약 전에 주변 지역을 확인하세요.
검색 시 입력 내용과 선택 도시를 OpenStreetMap Nominatim에 전송합니다. 사적인 주소나 민감 정보를 입력하지 마세요. 검색 서비스 정책
떠나기 전에 알아보세요
출처가 있는 연구 추정치입니다. 지역 자료가 불완전하며 필요시 광역 대체값을 사용합니다.
도시 전체 연구 추정치: 86/100. 모델 척도에서 높을수록 더 안전합니다. 근거 날짜: · 자료 신뢰도: B
색상은 도시 내 근거 자료를 반영합니다. 무색 지역은 지역 근거가 없으며 안전하다는 뜻이 아닙니다.
3056개 지역 표시 · 추정치 없는 경계 88개 추가 ·
경계: Statistics Bureau of Japan / e-Stat · 2020 Population Census small-area boundaries — Tokyo (e-Stat Terms of Use / CC BY 4.0 compatible)
도시 점수는 개별 거리·호텔·시간대를 설명하지 않습니다. 레이어의 출처·날짜·한계를 확인하세요.
A global-scale research estimate anchored by official 2025 Tokyo crime evidence, with Japan-level fallbacks and explicit uncertainty for dimensions without city-level coverage.
Research-only estimates. Scores combine city-local evidence with documented national or regional fallback inputs; confidence communicates uncertainty. They are not travel advice.
Global-scale research estimate anchored to Tokyo's city score. Official 2025 recorded-crime counts are divided by 2020 census resident population and shrunk toward the Tokyo-wide rate before mapping to the shared safety scale. Resident population does not represent commuters, nightlife, or traveler exposure; zero or masked population groups and boundary-only areas remain uncolored. Statistical small-area boundaries are not parcel boundaries. Not travel advice.
UK-traveler perspective; named entertainment districts are qualitative alerts rather than comparable incidence rates; current advice must be refreshed independently from the long-term baseline
alerts are not long-term baseline risk; event footprint may not equal traveler exposure; alert severity cannot be copied directly into Safrom score
country-level only; humanitarian risk framing differs from traveler exposure; composite inputs can overlap Safrom dimensions; current event conditions require separate signals
country-level only; reporting and justice-system differences; latest year differs by country; not traveler-specific
country-level only; availability does not measure emergency accessibility; latest year differs by country; distribution within a country is hidden
country-level only; collection is not annual for every country; some values are modeled estimates; resident exposure differs from traveler exposure
U.S.-traveler perspective; Level 1 is a broad country advisory and cannot represent Tokyo neighborhood variation; advisory level is not an absolute safety score
country-level only; modeled perceptions rather than traveler incidents; cannot represent neighborhood variation or current events; confidence intervals must not be discarded
police-recorded offences exclude unreported crime; 2020 resident population is five years older than the 2025 crime snapshot and does not represent commuter visitor hotel-night or traveler-day exposure; 58 evidence groups contain a zero or statistically masked population component and remain uncolored; 30 boundary-only features remain uncolored; neighborhood labels do not carry stable codes and require the separately versioned e-Stat identity join; the reviewed 2025-to-2020 join maps 3,113 of 3,120 neighborhood labels; 6 unknown-geography rows and the excluded Koto Central Breakwater row remain intentionally uncolored; the non-zero former Saneicho and current Yotsuya Saneicho rows are retained separately in provenance and summed once on their unchanged official boundary; each special ward appears as both a ward total and a ward subtotal and those rows must not be added to neighborhoods; the 37 columns have exactly one versioned product role so category totals and components are never added together; area values are a global-scale resident-rate research estimate with shrinkage rather than traveler victimization rates; the latest annual resource is fixed by URL and checksum because the Tokyo CKAN resource list had not yet registered R7 at validation time
e-Stat states that statistical small-area boundaries were created for statistical work and do not necessarily match general regional or administrative boundaries; the source is 2020 while the crime snapshot is 2025, so 13 changed-name or split-area labels use explicit versioned reviewed mappings rather than fuzzy matching; five shape records are duplicate parts of stable KEY_CODE areas and must be merged rather than scored separately; two selected special-ward shapes have no S_NAME and are excluded from address identity matching; six unknown-geography rows and Koto Central Breakwater remain intentionally uncolored; the 8.8 MB research GeoJSON is appropriate for the local demo but should become a vector-tile layer before production deployment
registered residents do not represent commuters visitors hotel nights or traveler-days; the publisher states that neighborhood names and ordering follow municipality reports and the table does not expose stable e-Stat small-area keys; the real 2025 CSV returned HTTP 403 from the current execution environment so checksum and row counts are intentionally not invented; the connector requires an explicit reviewed SHA-256 and validates 23 ward identities sex totals ward totals and normalized-name uniqueness; the older CKAN datastore preview stops at 1250 rows in Ota and must not substitute for the complete 2025 file; no rate score or Web color is generated before snapshot identity exposure and calibration review