正在加载地图…
英国
伦敦
城市选择
选择一个城市
数字是全球统一尺度的研究估算；R 表示研究中。所有内容均非旅行建议。
看看这里怎么样
找到心仪的酒店了？订房前，先看看周边区域。
搜索服务政策
点击搜索会把查询内容和所选城市发送给 OpenStreetMap Nominatim，请勿输入私人住址或敏感信息。 搜索服务政策
正在连接本地目录…
非常安全
较安全
谨慎
高风险
很高风险
极端风险
伦敦: 79
数字是全球统一尺度的研究估算；R 表示研究中。所有内容均非旅行建议。
找到心仪的酒店了？订房前，先看看周边区域。
点击搜索会把查询内容和所选城市发送给 OpenStreetMap Nominatim，请勿输入私人住址或敏感信息。 搜索服务政策
出发前，先了解
全球统一尺度的研究估算：以伦敦官方犯罪和公共交通数据为锚点，缺少城市覆盖的维度使用英国国家级回退。
城市研究估算为 79/100；模型尺度上分数越高越安全。 证据日期: · 置信度: B
颜色反映城市内部的区域证据。 空白处缺少区域证据，不代表安全。
33 个已映射区域 ·
边界数据: Greater London Authority · London Borough Boundaries (Greater London Authority open data terms)
城市估算不能评估某条街道、某家酒店或特定时段。
A global-scale research estimate anchored by official London crime and transport evidence, with United Kingdom-level fallbacks and explicit uncertainty for dimensions without city-level coverage.
Research-only estimates. Scores combine city-local evidence with documented national or regional fallback inputs; confidence communicates uncertainty. They are not travel advice.
Research estimate centered on London's global city score. Borough variation uses the latest single-month anonymized street-level records from the official UK Police API, weighted toward violence, robbery and traveler-relevant theft, then normalized by the latest Nomis resident population. Commuters, visitors, reporting practices, anonymized locations and a one-month window can materially distort central borough rates; City of London receives lower confidence. Overall only; not travel advice.
alerts are not long-term baseline risk; event footprint may not equal traveler exposure; alert severity cannot be copied directly into Safrom score
country-level only; humanitarian risk framing differs from traveler exposure; composite inputs can overlap Safrom dimensions; current event conditions require separate signals
country-level only; reporting and justice-system differences; latest year differs by country; not traveler-specific
police-recorded offences exclude unreported crime; fraud is primarily handled outside individual police-force data; resident commuter and traveler exposure are mixed; raw counts require a reviewed denominator; data uploaded after February 2024 comes from CONNECT and is not directly comparable with earlier files; City of London is policed separately
country-level only; availability does not measure emergency accessibility; latest year differs by country; distribution within a country is hidden
country-level only; collection is not annual for every country; some values are modeled estimates; resident exposure differs from traveler exposure
police-recorded crime excludes unreported crime; offence volumes mix residents commuters and visitors; acquisitive-crime share is not a traveler victimization rate; City of London Police coverage differs from Metropolitan Police Service coverage
network-level rate does not represent walking cycling taxis or private vehicles; reported incidents may understate victimization; passenger journeys are a transport exposure denominator rather than a resident or traveler population denominator
does not isolate London; U.S.-traveler perspective; Level 2 is driven by terrorism and is not an absolute safety score; narrative guidance requires structured extraction review
country-level only; modeled perceptions rather than traveler incidents; cannot represent neighborhood variation or current events; confidence intervals must not be discarded
boundary validity does not validate or score crime evidence; the official service also publishes other ward vintages so layer 9 and boundary version 2022 must remain pinned; the live boundary and MPS ward code sets have not yet been checksum-reconciled in the current network environment; City of London is excluded from the 32-borough election geography