正在加载地图…
法国
马赛
城市选择
选择一个城市
数字是全球统一尺度的研究估算；R 表示研究中。所有内容均非旅行建议。
看看这里怎么样
找到心仪的酒店了？订房前，先看看周边区域。
搜索服务政策
点击搜索会把查询内容和所选城市发送给 OpenStreetMap Nominatim，请勿输入私人住址或敏感信息。 搜索服务政策
正在连接本地目录…
非常安全
较安全
谨慎
高风险
很高风险
极端风险
马赛: 79
数字是全球统一尺度的研究估算；R 表示研究中。所有内容均非旅行建议。
找到心仪的酒店了？订房前，先看看周边区域。
点击搜索会把查询内容和所选城市发送给 OpenStreetMap Nominatim，请勿输入私人住址或敏感信息。 搜索服务政策
出发前，先了解
有来源的研究估算；本地覆盖不完整，部分维度沿用更广地理范围的基线。
城市研究估算为 79/100；模型尺度上分数越高越安全。 证据日期: · 置信度: C
研究估算：区域仅调整有当地证据的一个维度，其他维度沿用城市或国家基线。 空白处缺少区域证据，不代表安全。
16 个已映射区域 ·
边界数据: Etalab, IGN, OpenStreetMap contributors · 16 municipal arrondissements, geography 2026 (ODbL 1.0)
城市估算不能评估某条街道、某家酒店或特定时段。
Source-linked overall safety research estimate with an area safety layer; lower confidence reflects geographic fallbacks and incomplete local dimensions.
City violence and property inputs use ten separate SSMSI source indicators, bounded relative to the existing Paris research anchor. Only property theft pressure varies within this area map. Other dimensions inherit the city estimate. Resident population is not visitor exposure; road counts have no traffic-flow denominator. No street, hotel or night safety is established.
City violence and property inputs use ten separate SSMSI source indicators, bounded relative to the existing Paris research anchor. Only property theft pressure varies within this area map. Other dimensions inherit the city estimate. Resident population is not visitor exposure; road counts have no traffic-flow denominator. No street, hotel or night safety is established.
City violence and property inputs use ten separate SSMSI source indicators, bounded relative to the existing Paris research anchor.
Only property theft pressure varies within this area map. Other dimensions inherit the city estimate.
Resident population is not visitor exposure; road counts have no traffic-flow denominator. No street, hotel or night safety is established.
alerts are not long-term baseline risk; event footprint may not equal traveler exposure; alert severity cannot be copied directly into Safrom score
country-level only; humanitarian risk framing differs from traveler exposure; composite inputs can overlap Safrom dimensions; current event conditions require separate signals
country-level only; availability does not measure emergency accessibility; latest year differs by country; distribution within a country is hidden
country-level only; collection is not annual for every country; some values are modeled estimates; resident exposure differs from traveler exposure
Ten source indicators use separate like-for-like rate ratios against Paris; counts with different units are never added.; Resident-normalised records are not traveller victimisation probabilities; unreported crime and different visitor volumes remain limitations.; Local curve is a bounded research hypothesis, not an officially published safety score.
does not isolate Paris; U.S.-traveler perspective; advisory level is not an absolute safety score; narrative guidance requires structured extraction review
country-level only; modeled perceptions rather than traveler incidents; cannot represent neighborhood variation or current events; confidence intervals must not be discarded
The original SSMSI unit is victims heard for nonviolent theft from people. Not all victimisation is reported.; Resident denominators do not measure visitors and commuters. A central area can have a high resident-normalised rate without that being a visitor probability.; Only this property indicator varies; no overall safety score or day/night inference is made.