正在加载地图…
巴西
圣保罗
城市选择
选择一个城市
数字是全球统一尺度的研究估算；R 表示研究中。所有内容均非旅行建议。
看看这里怎么样
找到心仪的酒店了？订房前，先看看周边区域。
搜索服务政策
点击搜索会把查询内容和所选城市发送给 OpenStreetMap Nominatim，请勿输入私人住址或敏感信息。 搜索服务政策
正在连接本地目录…
非常安全
较安全
谨慎
高风险
很高风险
极端风险
圣保罗: 56
数字是全球统一尺度的研究估算；R 表示研究中。所有内容均非旅行建议。
找到心仪的酒店了？订房前，先看看周边区域。
点击搜索会把查询内容和所选城市发送给 OpenStreetMap Nominatim，请勿输入私人住址或敏感信息。 搜索服务政策
出发前，先了解
低置信度的首版参考：结合国家或地区级结构指标与官方旅行提示。
城市研究估算为 56/100；模型尺度上分数越高越安全。 证据日期: · 置信度: D
颜色反映城市内部的区域证据。 空白处缺少区域证据，不代表安全。
32 个已映射区域 ·
边界数据: Prefeitura de São Paulo · São Paulo — 32 subprefeituras (GeoSampa / URBIS) (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0))
城市估算不能评估某条街道、某家酒店或特定时段。
A low-confidence first reference using Brazil-level structural indicators with official violent-crime, robbery, and kidnapping guidance kept in the property dimension only.
Batch-generated global-scale research estimates. Local signals are used when available; otherwise documented country-level baselines and official current-condition guidance provide a low-confidence first reference. Not travel advice.
All 32 municipal subprefecture boundaries are represented, not the wider metropolitan region. Area variation uses the published traffic-death counts in Prefeitura de São Paulo's July 2025 indicator collection divided by its 2022 resident populations. The source lists a 2016-2023 historical series but does not explicitly state the aggregation window of the displayed counts; these are NOT annual rates. Log relative pressure is standardized across all 32 subprefectures, centered on the unchanged city score 56, with multiplier 4 and bounds 48-64. This cohort differs from the old five-parent sample. Only mobility evidence varies; population is not road-use, commuter or visitor exposure. No day/night difference or official safety ranking is inferred. 2026 display boundaries are joined to the published subprefecture names, not a reconstruction of historical boundaries. Derived geometry: Prefeitura de São Paulo / GeoSampa / URBIS, CC BY-SA 4.0. Research estimates, not travel advice.
alerts are not long-term baseline risk; event footprint may not equal traveler exposure; alert severity cannot be copied directly into Safrom score
country-level only; humanitarian risk framing differs from traveler exposure; composite inputs can overlap Safrom dimensions; current event conditions require separate signals
country-level only; reporting and justice-system differences; latest year differs by country; not traveler-specific
country-level only; availability does not measure emergency accessibility; latest year differs by country; distribution within a country is hidden
country-level only; collection is not annual for every country; some values are modeled estimates; resident exposure differs from traveler exposure
does not provide a comparable São Paulo incident rate; large within-city and time-of-day variation remains hidden; advisory level is not an absolute safety score; U.S.-traveler perspective
country-level only; modeled perceptions rather than traveler incidents; cannot represent neighborhood variation or current events; confidence intervals must not be discarded