Loading the map…
SSafromKnow before you roam
City guides & comparisons ↓
Netherlands

Amsterdam

Very safe
Safer
Caution
High risk
Very high risk
Extreme risk
City area safety
Loading area evidence…
Amsterdam: 83

Know before you roam

Amsterdam safety map and travel context

Back to the map ↑

Compare Amsterdam areas on the map, with local evidence and source details.

Safrom's citywide research estimate is 83/100. Higher scores mean safer on the model's scale. Evidence as of . Confidence: C.

What does this area's map cover?

110 areas with estimates. Area evidence as of .

recorded_pickpocketing_per_1000_residents · 2025-01-01/2025-12-31.

Local metric: recorded pickpocketing (police code 1.2.4), January–December 2025. Not all theft, fraud or violent crime. All 12 monthly observations are required and summed by the police/CBS 2025 ward code. 110 wards, including Weesp; 2,906 recorded incidents. Population is CBS 2025 resident population, rounded by the source. Visitor-heavy central wards have few residents relative to their visitors; this is not an individual visitor probability. Groot water (WK036399) has a missing population sentinel and is omitted. Zero recorded cases in other wards are observations, not guarantees. Boundaries simplified at 0.000025 degrees with topology preserved and area drift below 0.5%. The citywide score uses Netherlands national priors. Local evidence adjusts only property_and_scams.

Download the scored safety layer and calculation evidence (GeoJSON)

Area evidence and limitations

Local metric: recorded pickpocketing (police code 1.2.4), January–December 2025. Not all theft, fraud or violent crime. All 12 monthly observations are required and summed by the police/CBS 2025 ward code. 110 wards, including Weesp; 2,906 recorded incidents. Population is CBS 2025 resident population, rounded by the source. Visitor-heavy central wards have few residents relative to their visitors; this is not an individual visitor probability. Groot water (WK036399) has a missing population sentinel and is omitted. Zero recorded cases in other wards are observations, not guarantees. Boundaries simplified at 0.000025 degrees with topology preserved and area drift below 0.5%. The citywide score uses Netherlands national priors. Local evidence adjusts only property_and_scams.

Boundaries: CBS / Kadaster via PDOK · CBS Wijk- en Buurtkaart 2025 (CC BY 4.0).

Before choosing accommodation

  1. Locate your intended stay on the map and check whether that area has evidence.
  2. Read what drives the local differences. A citywide score and an area estimate answer different questions.
  3. Check current local advice and your transport options separately. These estimates cannot assess a specific hotel, street or time of day.

Citywide evidence

Personal violence
93/100
Property & scams
61/100
Getting around
90/100
Health & rescue
99/100
Conflict & stability
89/100
Disaster & environment
49/100
Infrastructure response
95/100

Local metric: recorded pickpocketing (police code 1.2.4), January–December 2025. Not all theft, fraud or violent crime. All 12 monthly observations are required and summed by the police/CBS 2025 ward code. 110 wards, including Weesp; 2,906 recorded incidents. Population is CBS 2025 resident population, rounded by the source. Visitor-heavy central wards have few residents relative to their visitors; this is not an individual visitor probability. Groot water (WK036399) has a missing population sentinel and is omitted. Zero recorded cases in other wards are observations, not guarantees. Boundaries simplified at 0.000025 degrees with topology preserved and area drift below 0.5%. The citywide score uses Netherlands national priors. Local evidence adjusts only property_and_scams.

City sources and their limitations

How Safrom uses sources

Browse all city comparisons →