A global-scale research estimate anchored by official 2025 FBI city-agency evidence, with United States-level fallbacks and explicit uncertainty for dimensions without city coverage.
Safrom's citywide research estimate is 73/100. Higher scores mean safer on the model's scale. Evidence as of . Confidence: C.
What does this area's map cover?
12 areas with estimates. Area evidence as of .
Area evidence and limitations
Public-alpha research estimate centered on Boston's global city score. Police-district variation uses Boston's official 2025 incident table grouped into violent and property categories, balanced with official district polygon-area density through a conservative robust transform. These are recorded incidents, not resident or visitor victimization rates; population, commuting, tourism, reporting, enforcement and land use materially affect the pattern. Overall only; not travel advice.
Locate your intended stay on the map and check whether that area has evidence.
Read what drives the local differences. A citywide score and an area estimate answer different questions.
Check current local advice and your transport options separately. These estimates cannot assess a specific hotel, street or time of day.
Citywide evidence
Personal violence
60/100
Property & scams
58/100
Getting around
80/100
Health & rescue
88/100
Conflict & stability
86/100
Disaster & environment
78/100
Infrastructure response
88/100
Batch-generated global-scale research estimates. Local signals are used when available; otherwise documented country-level baselines and official current-condition guidance provide a low-confidence first reference. Not travel advice.
the repository's staged 2025 snapshot is preliminary and blocked after the final annual release was detected; FBI warns against simplistic city rankings; reported offenses are not traveler exposure; law-enforcement agency coverage may differ from municipal boundaries; Florida and North Dakota have limited 2025 data and are excluded from the first cohort
country-level only; modeled perceptions rather than traveler incidents; cannot represent neighborhood variation or current events; confidence intervals must not be discarded